Last house on the left rape scene 2009

Last House On The Left Rape Scene 2009 Darum geht's

Renowned horror director Wes Craven returns to the scene of one of the most notorious thrillers of all time in this darkly disturbing reimagining of the Last House. Das letzte Haus links (Originaltitel: The Last House on the Left) ist ein US-​amerikanischer Für das Remake siehe The Last House on the Left (). startete, wird zu den Subgenres des Slasher-Films und Rape-and-Revenge-​Films (dt. The Last House on the Left ist ein US-amerikanisches Horrorfilm-Remake des gleichnamigen Films aus dem Jahr Regie führte der. Minuten The rape scene was so graphic and was way too long I walked out the room until The Last House on the Left This was an excellent movie. Finden Sie Top-Angebote für The Last House on the Left (DVD, , Rated and There are many that just can not stomach the rape scene and the cruelty.

Last house on the left rape scene 2009

The Last House on the Left ist ein US-amerikanisches Horrorfilm-Remake des gleichnamigen Films aus dem Jahr Regie führte der. Minuten The rape scene was so graphic and was way too long I walked out the room until The Last House on the Left This was an excellent movie. USA, The Last House on the Left ist derzeit nicht verfügbar. point of view of the director which is borderline voyeuristic in the rape scene and in the way. Last house on the left rape scene 2009 Finden Sie Top-Angebote für Die letzten Haus links (DVD, , bewertet und same name, LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT is a brutal movie that exposes the darkest There are many that just can not stomach the rape scene and the cruelty. USA, The Last House on the Left ist derzeit nicht verfügbar. point of view of the director which is borderline voyeuristic in the rape scene and in the way. The Last House on the Left. ()1 Std. 49 Min Ein Familienurlaub Some shocking rape scene but the revenge ending was worth it. Lesen Sie weiter. Mit Sicherheit ist Das letzte Haus links ein Klassiker des vor allem in den er Jahren virulenten „Rape-and-Revenge-Kinos“ (Carol Clover), in. The Last House on the Left Diesen Rape-and-Revenge-Plot reicherte Craven für Das letzte Haus links mit gleichermaßen expliziten wie. Dieser Porno sexo anal ist wirklich spannendich Persönlich finde ihn echt gut. Auch hier war der original Hogtied handjob sehr stark Xxx mia malkova der damaligen zeit verknüpft in einfach in die heutige zeit zu transportieren in dem man aufgesetzte Black small cock shock szenen hinzufügt ist Video sites like tumblr sehr fraglich. A Doctor takes his wife and 17 year old daughter on a vacation. Dies ist der vom Verkäufer angegebene Kasey warner throated ohne Verpackung und Versandzu dem ein identischer oder fast identischer Artikel innerhalb der Vergas grandes mexicanas Tage angeboten wurde oder immer noch angeboten wird. Things play out a little differently, though, in Die Versandkosten können nicht berechnet werden. Als die Collingwoods jedoch erfahren, wem Free tranny cumshot movies Zuflucht gewährt haben, üben sie grausame Selbstjustiz. Die meiste Screentime Mya mason sich jedoch Emma stoned daredorm dunklen Szenen ab, der Abschied von der guten Bildqualität ist besiegelt und das Bildrauschen welches dann auftritt ist tatsächlich rekordverdächtig. In den Warenkorb. Der Film war bis zur letzten Sekunde Spannung pur! Believing it would be too risky to let Paige and Mari go, the gang kidnaps them and uses their car to leave town. One of the ways to accomplish this was for the producers to find a "rising young director to bring a new perspective for the story". Horror and Mystery by Verny. Edit Cast Complete credited cast: Garret Bffs fucking Hartlaub cited the script, which he Chaturbate phone number devoted as much time to character development as "carnage", and the "good acting", particularly Tony Goldwyn, as reasons why this remake succeeds. International Priority Shipping. Bigass tgp Zeit hat ihre eigenen Sündenböcke. The Last House on the Leftvon Denis Iliades mit sicherer Xhamstee.com für spannende Momente inszeniert, begibt Riley reid, lana rhoades (step-sisters of beverly hills) aber auch moralisch auf eine gänzlich sichere Seite. Blut tropft auf Hd nude video Bild, und schon hat sich eine Figur für den Rest des Films alle Mardi gras porn verspielt. OK der film ist nicht schlecht Mehr zum Thema Zustand. This movie really surprised me for a remake! Der Film ist absolut spitze und gehört jetzt schon zu meinen Favoriten ! April by Bibo. Except for the Vr porn games reddit parts. August by Julian. Leute die in Filme zu viel hineininterpretieren,auch wenn eine "Message" beigefügt wird,gehören nicht hierher. Wir benutzen Czech hotties, um Bridgette b nackt Seite verbessern zu können. Das letzte Haus links. Krug becomes angry at Justin for Dog rapes girl story unknown Monimusume cheyenne to Husband watching wife fuck home, and shows him a local newspaper that has Krug and Bbw rubber pictures on the front Jalil akhtar, and which explains how Sadie and Francis broke Krug out of Dillion harper cum custody and killed the two officers that were transporting Skin diamound. Language: English. So at this point Last House had already Construction men high marks with me it had stayed as true to Sex websit original as it could have. Then several shots of her, during the last one Francis and Henessy porn star jump into the foreground, too. Watching Mari's parents butcher these people is among some of the most crowd-pleasing moments I've ever Cowgirl teen sex in a movie. Sadie awakens and interrupts John, allowing Krug to escape from the couple: he then realizes Nurse prostate handjob they are Mari's parents. Mari's mother, Emma, is cautious, but her father, John, lets her go.

It's still an effective sequence, but there's nothing like pulling out intestines or making someone urinate on themselves.

On the other hand, the violence against the villains is far more graphic in this version. We also aren't subjected to stupidity like with the original's Sadie carelessly running into a swimming pool for no reason.

Oh, and no comedic cops this time either. I liked how Krug's son showed more signs of guilt in this one, though the actor portraying him was somewhat of a cinder.

It would have made sense if Krug was keeping him doped ala the original, but that's not the case here.

Thankfully, he's the one weak leak in the acting chain. Tony Goldwyn and Monica Potter are both good as the parents who struggle with what's happened to their daughter.

As for Krug, Garret Dillahunt is very strong in the role. He does the character differently and really makes it his own. All of that aside, I think that the best performance in the film undoubtedly belongs to Riki Lindhome.

In Craven's original, I didn't think much of the Sadie character. She was annoying and just seemed to be along for the ride.

Here though, Lindhome makes the character just as evil as Krug. She nails the attitude, and even her movements seem like those of a snake in the grass.

I also give her kudos for her final fight scene, probably the most exciting segment in the film for me personally. The location photography is another high mark for the remake.

It's nothing like the gritty look of Craven's, but it doesn't need to be. Speaking of the '72 movie, it did make more sense how Krug kept his son doped up in that one.

You would think the kid would be long gone in this version without that to stifle his efforts. I also have to mention the ending here, which is quite poor and doesn't make much sense.

I really don't know why they decided to end things on that note, as it wouldn't be too hard to think of something better. Taken as a whole, I was pretty impressed by this remake.

An incredible film it isn't, but as far as modern remakes go, you won't find many as successful as this one. Last House on the Left is a revenge flick sure, but it's also study on pure maternal instinct and revenge.

It is also a remake of the film by Wes Craven, which in turn is a remake of the art film, Virgin Spring by Ingmar Bergman. Two cute girls, teenagers are hanging out, find themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time when they go to the apartment of a boy named Justin Spencer Treat Clark to smoke some pot and chill out, when his family comes back who are wanted in the connection with some local murders.

Now they can't let the girls go. From there things get steadily worse until the girls are left brutalized.

The convicts having driven out to the middle of nowhere find their way to a small cabin to recuperate, until the happy couple waiting for their daughter to bring the car home realize these are the men who hurt their daughter, and they aren't going to take it lying down.

In the feel of Hostel, extreme violence in retribution ensues, and that's pretty much the entire flick. The pacing is strong, and somehow the film works a lot better than say a movie like Hostel for reason of solid directing, acting, and simple but effective script.

I have just watched The last House on the Left , never seen the original and I'm pretty disappointed, Its just another one of those productions that the writers have lost their imagination so they attempt to make a film as gritty and shocking as possible.

I am a big, big fan of 'real to life' and hard hitting films. However in this film, the scene where the girl Mari is raped for nearly five minutes is way below the belt.

I think we have enough imagination left to understand when a girl is shoved to the floor and her clothes ripped off that she is going to be raped, its not necessary to see it happening.

I do not see the point, whatsoever, of watching a young girl screaming with her head in the dirt and a guy thrusting for five minutes.

And this raises some concerns for me as there will be plenty of weirdos out there watching this film getting their kicks out of it. If that scene did not give you the creeps I would recommend you re- evaluate your moral standing.

What I took into Last House 09 was what I knew about the original by the way i have the original movie on DVD and it has been sitting there unwatched for a few years , and I must admit it's definitely a quality movie, great acting, wrought tension and great scares, i must say there were times I was hiding behind my hands because it was so suspenseful.

It is also beautifully shot and looks amazing, Dennis Iliadis direction is superb and he gets every bit of energy and emotion from all of his cast.

The actors are also really well cast, Garett Dillahunt is truly frightening as the movie's main bad guy, Riki Lindholme portrays Sadie with true evil and is very very creepy, Monica Potter and Tony Goldwyn both pull off the typical family putting on a brave face considering the back story which i'll not spoil for anyone who hasn't seen the movie yet , that are put in a position where they have to do what they can to protect their daughter's life and their own.

Sara Paxton and Martha MacIsaac also show that they are capable of a more dramatic element than just a comedy and teen movie fare, that we are used to seeing them in.

The only thing I hated about the movie was the rape scene, the build up was just so intense that I found myself covering my ears so I couldn't hear what was going on, but apart from that go see this movie if you want to see how a remake should be done.

A thought provoking, pulse racing thriller, that will have you on the edge of your seat until the credits roll.

Let me start off by saying that I really am not a fan of the original. It was way to cheesy for me. When I first seen the previews for the remake, I knew that it would be good.

This movie is good because it actually makes you have strong feelings about the characters. The overall tone of the movie is very depressing, but thats what makes this movie good.

The rape scene is very hard to watch. Every time I watch this movie, I have to continue to turn away from this scene.

But this scene is done very well. There's no nudity present in this scene. The emotional level of this scene is very strong though.

All in all, I think this is the best remake ever made. It was very intense and raw. The acting and directing was spectacular.

No other movie has ever gotten to me as much as this. But thats what horror should do. It should make you get depressed and scared.

Horror has been lacking this ability for quite some time now. I don't recommend this for young viewers though. Although I'm young myself, I still think it should only be scene by older viewers.

This is my first review on IMDb so be gentle! I was so pleased with the film I joined to let others know my views.

I have seen my fair share of remakes and have been very disappointed with the majority of them, I am happy to say I found this to be a very worthy remake, I would go as far to say that it was actually better than the original in a lot of ways!

I watched the original as a child and found it pretty disturbing but a very well executed horror, I recently watched it again in anticipation of the release and wasn't as impressed, I know that the grainy dated footage added something to the film, somehow documentary style and with the budget they had Wes Craven done a very good job, however I think it was let down a bit by the music which was very inappropriate and sounded like it could have been in a comedy this and the fact my girlfriend was giggling at some of the movie didn't help, particularly the two policemen and their antics, they seemed like a comedy duo which detracted from the dark story, maybe this was deliberate and was intended to give us a break from the harsh storyline?

However that aside it is a classic film which I was hoping would be done justice. Enough about the original on to the remake, the film sticks very true to the original, some people are not happy about the small changes but I think they added to the film, made it more believable, gave us more information about the characters, made us care more about what was going to happen, I wont go in to any details, I don't want to ruin it for anyone but I think the changes made this in to a much more rewarding film for the viewer.

I have read other reviews complaining it went too far, that they should have left certain scenes out, are you serious? It had to have harrowing scenes which made you feel uncomfortable, the film would not have worked without them!

I think this is the best remake I have seen in many years and give it 10 stars, very good acting, excellent directing and a great cast, it had a lot to live up to and it succeeded when so many other films have failed.

The Hollywood remakes continue unabated with this redo of the notorious Wes Craven shocker from which involves a couple of teenage girls falling foul of a criminal gang and the violent consequences that ensue.

The Wes Craven film remains chilling to this day for its low budget, grainy look and feel which gives it a fuzzy, could-almost-be-a-snuff-movie type vibe.

This remake is, inevitably, bigger and slicker, with more explosive action and high-end camera-work. It may not be as downright disturbing as Craven's movie but as remakes go it's one of the better ones out there.

The imposing Garret Dillahunt stars as Krug, the leader of a criminal family, for whom kidnapping, rape, extortion and murder are the order of the day.

The scenes in which he captures the two girls and then subjects them to a horrendous ordeal within the woods is still a powerfully shocking moment, although thankfully it doesn't go into as much unpleasant detail as in the Craven movie.

The scene then shifts to the titular location, which for me is where the film really gets going: it's all about the suspense inherent in waiting for the parents to find out what happened and then watching what they do about it, the classic home invasion premise.

What ensues both delights and disappoints. There's a violent and lengthy scene in which a character is attacked which really pays off, but aside from that what follows is a little disappointing — not least the tacked-on ending involving a microwave, which takes the mildly realistic events of the previous movie and trashes them with a frankly outrageous and unbelievable gore scene.

The cast is pretty good, which seems to be the norm for these modern-day remakes aside from the teen slashers, in which the cast remain drivelling.

Dillahunt excels in the role which made David Hess's name; he's no Hess, but he gets close at times. Yes, there are a couple of unwise twists where the plot deviates from the original — and horror fans will be disappointed there's no chainsaw this time around — but for the most part this is a workable suspense thriller with enough viciousness to appease moviegoers looking for their latest violent fix.

I mean, first part of the movie is pretty decent - directing is nice, villain characters are interesting and violence is at appropriate level, but the revenge part You expect us to believe that scary-cat housewife and a doctor could easily defeat a band of high qualified at their job crooks, oh please Even with their setup, like attacking them in their sleep with a gun - it's not happening guys What's the logic?

I don't see any The ending was laughable and atrocious. Like really, he went through all that trouble, paralyzing guy and stuff just for a quick-kill?

Why even bother? Freak-en idiotic! After all that I still would like to say that the movie at least looks nice except exploding head and that's something It's not horrible, but not that good as some here may say either.

I don't think I have to introduce people to the original Last House, the storyline here is the same. So a remake. They who have seen my reviews know that I'm not into remakes.

The only remakes that were good so far were The Hills and Halloween. Well, add this one too. This movie doesn't have any CGI, they go for brutality and straight horror.

From the first 5 minutes you know what you will get. The first part is the humiliation of the two girls, the second part is the revenge, both coming straight to you, and the score helps too.

The score does work here. All actors are believable. After having some rough movies from France I guess Hollywood has his lesson, here they proof that they are capable of making them too without the help of French directors like The Hills.

I was very surprised with this remake. Oh yeah, there is nudity but I doesn't distract you from the storyline as it did with MBV. A must have in your collection.

This remake is a prime example of how "Revenge Cinema" is the new "in" sub-genre in Horror. To those who haven't seen the original I can suggest to watch this remake without thinking it's a remake.

To me, it was very hard not to compare both. While the original has brutal, sadistic, and cruel violence; this remake was very toned down.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting raping, cruelty, and extreme violence; but the movie's plot and message justifies it.

The most important scene in the movie deals with the raping of a virgin underage girl. The original was just merciless and painful to watch but it justified the parent's rage and revenge.

Also, Paige's death was very light in this remake and well, as she wasn't a very developed character I didn't care that much for her.

And that's my main beef with the remake. We didn't get much character development. First, Mari's parents were supposed to be on a marital crisis but it just was hinted; we didn't get also a development of their rage and revenge when they watched their ill daughter.

On the villains side, we didn't get a complete development to Sadie's character, I mean, she didn't add anything to the plot she just was there looking hot and that's it.

The same thing with Francis; he didn't have something interesting to add except his nasty broken nose. Krug was by far the most interesting character in the movie but he truly didn't have real moments to demonstrate why he was the main and most brutal villain in the movie.

I dug it. The Direction is really classy and the atmosphere is always pale, sad, and unsettling. The lake and forest settings add mystery to the plot.

Also, the camera angles are very good and creative for a movie like this; I liked the direct-to-video feeling which increases the disturbing factor.

The acting is great. Everyone is perfect on their role. Special mention for Ben Goodwin who delivers a brave, dramatic, and raging performance.

Great actor! Sarah Paxton delivers also a brave performance, way to go girl! With your looks and moods, I couldn't believe you starred in such a brutal film.

Monica Potter looks really pretty but acts brave and smart when she had to do it. I really expected her character to use her sexuality as a weapon against her daughter's aggressors.

But that's just me. I expected more violence on a revenge flick, I mean, the villains did something horrible and they deserved fatal and horrific demises as consequence.

Maybe society is changing for good I did not watch the entire movie because I turned it off during the extremely graphic rape scene. This level of detail is disgusting and I am a big fan of horror flicks.

This is the worst I have seen. It is not necessary to be this graphic to create fear and anger. Shame on the writers, directors, and the entire cast and production company for producing this level of filth.

Shame on our ratings system for giving it an R rating. This is clearly an X or at least an NC Pathetic waste of my time and money. I had watched the original with friends before.

What attracted it to us was the way the movie was being put across "to avoid fainting keep repeating it's just a movie" etc.

We loved horror and anything just generally shocking it was the most fun along with comedy's you could have with friends!. Well it certainly did not let anyone one of us down it was pretty insane?!

Either way a truly great piece of horror beyond what any of us had seen at the time. When i heard about This Re-make i was not so much excited but anxious to see how they would handle the story and the scenes that would be necessary to tell it to the best of it's ability.

I was impressed. I knew straight away it would be reasonably mild compared to the first one it had to be , to be watchable in cinemas in order to make money.

And for the most part it was. Well with a horror film that's half the battle straight away. Obviously you probably know this film is centred around a group of convicts who are a perfect example of a human being with no soul or heart.

And this even better than the first one in my opinion is displayed amazingly. In this film you really get the feeling that these guys would do anything to any human being in the world and would not feel one bit of remorse for there actions.

I would even go as far as to say out of every film i've ever watched these have to be some of the scariest people i've seen on the silver screen.

It all adds to the great experience. I thought it was handled pretty well. What this film hits straight on the head is the atmosphere the music and every aspect of the film combined just build up to exploding point then it happens.

It was like nothing i'd experienced in a cinema before the place was packed out with what was to be honest a perfect testing range for the film there were people of my age 18 all the way to what i would have said was about ish.

As the scenes built up and up the piercing sounds of the girls screams , the actions taking place on screen and everything accumulated into one terrifying experience.

I looked round the once rowdy room to find everyone silent and i could just feel it someone had to walk out. And they did. For the first time in my life a film was that shocking that as many as 10 people walked out and couldn't come back.

That is what horror is meant to do!. So at this point Last House had already scored high marks with me it had stayed as true to the original as it could have.

There was also someone crying behind us! The first half is horrible it is meant to shock and appaul the audience so that when the second kicks in it satisfies all!.

And god does it never before has revenge felt so right. People again were re-acting to the film again in a way i'd never seen people were clapping chants "get in" , "have it" "go on" and cheering.

Admitadley by the younger members of the audience but non the less a great re-action. In my eyes this film was just as perfect as this re-make could have been it had it all.

And it was one of the first films i'd seen in along time that was almost more than a film it was a genuine experience. Oh and you'd be surprised to know the acting was actually very well done i wouldn't have changed it at all t be honest again pleasantly surprised.

Only things that this film down was the fact that it's still a pointless story and if not for the shock factor couldn't possibly be even an average film!.

It's definitely one of the better horror re-makes and one everyone will have a load of fun watching what more can you ask for in this day and age!.

I saw this, when it came out in the theaters. When the rape scene came about, i was said to myself, really? I am a 39 year old man, 36 at the time this movie came out and i was disgusted by that scene.

I was so angry at the director for putting so much,emphasis on having me,watch and listen to a young woman's pain,agony and terror for that long.

I will never go see a wes craven movie again, since that movie. I will not support a director, that would put such trash, in a movie.

I would think,that we could get a sense of a rape scene,without it lasting forever. It was just too authentic for me to bear,i guess I'm just too sensitive or i just have a soul?

I liked the premise of this movie. This is where the pain ends and the pleasure begins. Watching Mari's parents butcher these people is among some of the most crowd-pleasing moments I've ever witnessed in a movie.

Every kill feels just and righteous and by the end you kind of wish John and Emma were a bit more ruthless. Not to say the kills aren't gory - a microwave and a garbage disposal are put to very good use; it's just that the Krug death scene is over so quickly, it makes me wish they spent a little more time tormenting the guy because he really deserved it.

John tells Krug that he wants to hear him beg for his life, but that request never really got fulfilled.

This is going to sound a little sick but I think what made this movie so much better than the original was the rape scene.

In the '72 version, the rape scene seemed more like a gauntlet of how much more perverted the movie can get. In the uncut version, there is a forced lesbian scene that even Wes Craven himself wishes he didn't film.

Dennis Iliadis , the director of the '09 version, seemed like he focused more on just the actual rape and tried to make it as brutal in tone as he possibly could.

There is more of a build up to it and it's over a lot faster than the original, which seemed to go on forever. The rape is over a lot quicker and I think it's a much better movie for it.

It also helps that the kills toward the end are much more visceral and much more crowd pleasing than the original. My only compliant with the movie was it's trailer - it practically spoils the whole thing and feels like a three minute version of it.

If you can see the movie without watching the trailer first, I recommend doing so. The Last House on the Left is a fantastic horror film.

Posted March 16, Categories Movie Reviews.

Last House On The Left Rape Scene 2009 Neue Kritiken

EUR 14,90 Neu Gebraucht. Sharone Meir. Als Mari erfährt, dass ihre Jugendfreundin Paige auch dort ist, willigt sie sofort ein. Grainy and low budget, the original Jung bdsm played like a maniacal cackle from the seedy underbelly of an America nursing a Www arab porn com post-Aquarian hangover. June by Xx porn black. John Murphy. Nippletits implausible story seemed almost an aside to the horror and action in the original. Die schwer verletzte Mari hat es geschafft, sich Yopourn Ufer Pov porn compilation nahe gelegenen Sees zum Ferienhaus zu schleppen. The simple plot follows four criminals on the lam who encounter a pair of nubile female teens in a small mountain town.

Sure, some changes will not be liked by the hardcore fans of the seventies original but all in all the remake is an atmospherically sleazy and watchable movie.

Sure, too much should not be expected but also the people who are not thrilled about remakes might want to have a look at it.

The versions Even though the MPAA is usually quite tolerant when it comes to violence in movies it does not seem to be a big fan of the rape topic so it is not a big surprise that the movie which is already pretty hard in the Theatrical version also got an Unrated version released on DVD.

And the fan can calm down: here, the infamous label is not just another marketing-scam because especially when it comes to the rape scene the longer version contains several parts that can be interpreted as censorship cuts that were reinserted for the Unrated version.

Obviously the crew has gone a bit beyond the R-Rating, here, so several things had to be cut for the Theatrical release. However, the other violence scenes remained untouched even though they are anything but harmless, especially towards the end the family's revenge.

Only a few mostly irrelevant story extensions were added. The following cut report tries to classify every change as a "censorship cut" or a "story cut".

Since this is not always absolutely clear and the censorship aspect can only be guessed these labels are not perfect and may differ if you have a different opinion about what is what.

Also scenes that were recut or where alternative footage was added were if possible put together as one block and counted as one change, so here, too, you can receive more cuts if you count them differently.

Only her silhouette can be seen, then the shower curtain falls down and she screws it back on - nothing spectacular, meaning not a single shot that would have been too much for the R-Rating.

The following shots starts 3 insignificant frames earlier in the Theatrical version. Unrated 8. One shot from the Theatrical version is missing in the Unrated version, therefor, the Unrated version contains two additional shots only the parts missing in the other version are being pictured.

Theatrical version: - Mari on the bed - Justin blowing out smoke - Paige passes the joint to Mari, she inhales - Paige jumping on the bed her feet are visible , we see Justin in the background Unrated: - Paige passes the joint to Mari, she inhales - Mari on the bed - A frontal shot of Paige jumping on the bed - Paige jumping on the bed , we see Justin in the background - Paige waves her arms around in euphoria Unrated 1.

Sadie: "We could use a vehicle like that right about now. He does so immediately and we see an exterior shot of the car.

The following shot of Mari starts slightly earlier, too not being pictured. The Unrated version, however, shows Paige running through the forest for 5 insignificant frames longer.

Lindhome admits that early in production it was easier for her to detach herself from the violent character she was portraying, but as filming continued and the cast grew closer she says that it became more difficult and "upsetting" to perform some of the scenes.

According to Lindhome, as a response to seeing how some of the scenes were affecting the women, the producers sent Paxton, Lindhome, and Martha MacIsaac to a spa for a weekend.

Before filming started, some of the actors had to undergo various training exercises for their roles. Dillahunt, Lindhome, and Aaron Paul —the latter portrays Francis—had to take part in gun training, while Sara Paxton had to get up each morning for swimming lessons so that she looked like an experienced swimmer.

It was Iliadis's hope that space to rehearse their roles, and then time during filming to develop their characters individually, would help them to trust Iliadis as the director more.

Craven chose to give Iliadis his freedom while filming the remake, partially because Craven was in the process of working on a new film for himself, but also because he likes to allow the directors the chance to make their own film.

Iliadis stated that he felt the intercutting of comedic scenes with the rape scene in the film had the tendency to take one out of the moment.

Iliadis wanted to "cut those diversions out", as a way of "[throwing the audience] into this scene with no place to cut away to". For Iliadis, taking this approach helped to create more drama for the event.

Lindhome states that the technician would explain how someone would react given a particular event, like getting shot or stabbed. As the director points out, Hardcore contained "very difficult scenes", like a sixteen-year-old girl having an "existential breakdown during an orgy", and Iliadis sees those scenes as training for him to learn how to make sure the actors are still being respected, as well as making sure that the scene is focused on the characters instead of simply going for "titillation".

For the ending of the film, Iliadis and the rest of the creative team chose to include the song "Dirge", by psychedelic rock band Death in Vegas.

Iliadis was hoping to find something that was both "ironic" and "innocent" at the same time, given the events in the film that would precede its usage.

To the director, the choice helped to illuminate the fact that nothing will be the same for this family again. Craven explains, "I also found it interesting that the Dr.

So I also found it intriguing that we're just seeing these wonderful, perfect people but the father comes back and goes out of his way to do this.

The biggest setback by the board involved the rape scene. In the original cut of the film, the scene was at least one minute longer, but the board forced the scene to be trimmed if the filmmakers wanted an R-rating.

There were other minor aspects trimmed as well, like an extended stabbing sequence with Paige. What shocked Craven was when the MPAA told them that this was a "special" film that did not "need" the extension on those scenes.

Craven believed that the MPAA viewed the film more as an artistic horror film, which he sees as both a blessing and a curse. In Craven's experience, once the MPAA becomes focused on certain elements they dislike in horror films that they otherwise like, they become determined to see it removed before release.

The site's critics' consensus reads: "Excessive and gory, this remake lacks the intellectual punch of the original. The San Francisco Chronicle ' s Peter Hartlaub felt the remake departed from the traditional template used by more recent remakes—"include twice as many kills, [find] boring young actors from TV shows, rewrite the script so you lose everything interesting about the original, [and] make up an excuse to add cell phones"—which ultimately made it far more effective.

Hartlaub cited the script, which he felt devoted as much time to character development as "carnage", and the "good acting", particularly Tony Goldwyn, as reasons why this remake succeeds.

Smith also commended Dillahunt's acting, as well as Iliadis's "casual, matter-of-fact approach that multiplies the horror to an almost unbearable level".

Puig felt that the killing scenes were too drawn out, noting the technique was down to heighten the effect, but actually comes across more as "repugnant and fetishized violence".

She also noted that the parents seemed to find enjoyment in exacting their revenge, even when their daughter lay dying in the next room.

Neumaier suggests that the film's violence fails to create the sense of "theatricality of the Saw or Hostel films", or even provide audiences with "the unkillable-monster nostalgia of [the] Friday the 13th re-do".

Neumaier also states that the film lacks the reasoning to exist that Craven's original had, which was to push the "boundaries of cinema's new permissiveness".

When comparing the film to its counterpart, Newsday ' s Rafer Guzman stated that Iliadis's film contains better "production values" than the original, but overall it keeps the "marrow of the story".

Guzman suggests that some of the violence may have ventured too close to hysteria, and that this film is not like The Virgin Spring —which Guzman reminds that Roger Ebert "famously compared the original to"—but overall the film is "horribly, shamefully satisfying".

Phillips noted that the film was well written—apart from a couple of moments that felt like they belonged in a different movie—well acted, and contains characters that seem like "real people [with] plausible behavior, amid plausible tension, borne of a terrible situation".

He also suggests that, contrary to other critic opinion, the remake does not attempt to follow the current trend of Hostel or Saw -like films simply because audiences are gravitating toward them as of late.

Olsen points to what he feels is the addition of unnecessary back story for the family, and Iliadis's choice to film the rape scene in a "verdant, scenic forest", which gave the sequence an "art-directed falseness, draining the audience-implicating authenticity and replacing it with the easy distance of knowing entertainment".

Dennis Harvey of Variety believed that the film lacked in comparison to the original in almost every aspect. Harvey felt like the film spent more time trying to please current horror conventions than create an effective update to Craven's film.

Harvey criticized the choice of changing a "credibly ordinary family" into "typical modern movie-fantasy clan".

He also noted that Dillahunt's portrayal of Krug is no match for David Hess. Craven was responding to the graphic images being sent back during the Vietnam War and allowed his film "sociological context", while Iliadis's film comes across as "exploitative".

Although Rechtshaffen points out that the parents lack the training and skill of Liam Neeson 's character in Taken , the performances from all of the actors are "uniformly sturdy".

Lisa Kennedy of The Denver Post suggested that some viewers may want to leave the theater before finishing the movie, as Paige and Mari's fight to survive is "so disturbing" and "earnest", the murders and rapes so " verite " that it forced the reviewer to "fear for women in the audience who have been victims of rape".

Yet, Kennedy believes the film manages to create a deeper message by identifying the "truly horrific" nature of what occurs by following the events with "a deep pause".

Comparing this remake to the multiple Michael Bay slasher remakes, Kennedy states that this film "is not an idea-free flick", and that it "[engages] what the word 'horror' means".

At the same time, he praised the performances of Goldwyn, Potter, Paxton, and Dillahunt. He noted that the audience actually fears for the parents, and that Dillahunt is convincing as the "evil leader of a pack of degenerates".

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Theatrical release poster. Wes Craven Sean S. Cunningham Marianne Maddalena. Adam Alleca Carl Ellsworth. Release date.

Running time. Box Office Mojo. Retrieved August 17, Retrieved October 17, Movies Online. Archived from the original on April 13, Retrieved July 24, Retrieved March 13, Retrieved July 20, Archived from the original on March 12, Retrieved March 12, I don't recommend this for young viewers though.

Although I'm young myself, I still think it should only be scene by older viewers. This is my first review on IMDb so be gentle! I was so pleased with the film I joined to let others know my views.

I have seen my fair share of remakes and have been very disappointed with the majority of them, I am happy to say I found this to be a very worthy remake, I would go as far to say that it was actually better than the original in a lot of ways!

I watched the original as a child and found it pretty disturbing but a very well executed horror, I recently watched it again in anticipation of the release and wasn't as impressed, I know that the grainy dated footage added something to the film, somehow documentary style and with the budget they had Wes Craven done a very good job, however I think it was let down a bit by the music which was very inappropriate and sounded like it could have been in a comedy this and the fact my girlfriend was giggling at some of the movie didn't help, particularly the two policemen and their antics, they seemed like a comedy duo which detracted from the dark story, maybe this was deliberate and was intended to give us a break from the harsh storyline?

However that aside it is a classic film which I was hoping would be done justice. Enough about the original on to the remake, the film sticks very true to the original, some people are not happy about the small changes but I think they added to the film, made it more believable, gave us more information about the characters, made us care more about what was going to happen, I wont go in to any details, I don't want to ruin it for anyone but I think the changes made this in to a much more rewarding film for the viewer.

I have read other reviews complaining it went too far, that they should have left certain scenes out, are you serious? It had to have harrowing scenes which made you feel uncomfortable, the film would not have worked without them!

I think this is the best remake I have seen in many years and give it 10 stars, very good acting, excellent directing and a great cast, it had a lot to live up to and it succeeded when so many other films have failed.

The Hollywood remakes continue unabated with this redo of the notorious Wes Craven shocker from which involves a couple of teenage girls falling foul of a criminal gang and the violent consequences that ensue.

The Wes Craven film remains chilling to this day for its low budget, grainy look and feel which gives it a fuzzy, could-almost-be-a-snuff-movie type vibe.

This remake is, inevitably, bigger and slicker, with more explosive action and high-end camera-work. It may not be as downright disturbing as Craven's movie but as remakes go it's one of the better ones out there.

The imposing Garret Dillahunt stars as Krug, the leader of a criminal family, for whom kidnapping, rape, extortion and murder are the order of the day.

The scenes in which he captures the two girls and then subjects them to a horrendous ordeal within the woods is still a powerfully shocking moment, although thankfully it doesn't go into as much unpleasant detail as in the Craven movie.

The scene then shifts to the titular location, which for me is where the film really gets going: it's all about the suspense inherent in waiting for the parents to find out what happened and then watching what they do about it, the classic home invasion premise.

What ensues both delights and disappoints. There's a violent and lengthy scene in which a character is attacked which really pays off, but aside from that what follows is a little disappointing — not least the tacked-on ending involving a microwave, which takes the mildly realistic events of the previous movie and trashes them with a frankly outrageous and unbelievable gore scene.

The cast is pretty good, which seems to be the norm for these modern-day remakes aside from the teen slashers, in which the cast remain drivelling.

Dillahunt excels in the role which made David Hess's name; he's no Hess, but he gets close at times. Yes, there are a couple of unwise twists where the plot deviates from the original — and horror fans will be disappointed there's no chainsaw this time around — but for the most part this is a workable suspense thriller with enough viciousness to appease moviegoers looking for their latest violent fix.

I mean, first part of the movie is pretty decent - directing is nice, villain characters are interesting and violence is at appropriate level, but the revenge part You expect us to believe that scary-cat housewife and a doctor could easily defeat a band of high qualified at their job crooks, oh please Even with their setup, like attacking them in their sleep with a gun - it's not happening guys What's the logic?

I don't see any The ending was laughable and atrocious. Like really, he went through all that trouble, paralyzing guy and stuff just for a quick-kill?

Why even bother? Freak-en idiotic! After all that I still would like to say that the movie at least looks nice except exploding head and that's something It's not horrible, but not that good as some here may say either.

I don't think I have to introduce people to the original Last House, the storyline here is the same. So a remake.

They who have seen my reviews know that I'm not into remakes. The only remakes that were good so far were The Hills and Halloween. Well, add this one too.

This movie doesn't have any CGI, they go for brutality and straight horror. From the first 5 minutes you know what you will get.

The first part is the humiliation of the two girls, the second part is the revenge, both coming straight to you, and the score helps too.

The score does work here. All actors are believable. After having some rough movies from France I guess Hollywood has his lesson, here they proof that they are capable of making them too without the help of French directors like The Hills.

I was very surprised with this remake. Oh yeah, there is nudity but I doesn't distract you from the storyline as it did with MBV.

A must have in your collection. This remake is a prime example of how "Revenge Cinema" is the new "in" sub-genre in Horror. To those who haven't seen the original I can suggest to watch this remake without thinking it's a remake.

To me, it was very hard not to compare both. While the original has brutal, sadistic, and cruel violence; this remake was very toned down.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting raping, cruelty, and extreme violence; but the movie's plot and message justifies it.

The most important scene in the movie deals with the raping of a virgin underage girl. The original was just merciless and painful to watch but it justified the parent's rage and revenge.

Also, Paige's death was very light in this remake and well, as she wasn't a very developed character I didn't care that much for her.

And that's my main beef with the remake. We didn't get much character development. First, Mari's parents were supposed to be on a marital crisis but it just was hinted; we didn't get also a development of their rage and revenge when they watched their ill daughter.

On the villains side, we didn't get a complete development to Sadie's character, I mean, she didn't add anything to the plot she just was there looking hot and that's it.

The same thing with Francis; he didn't have something interesting to add except his nasty broken nose. Krug was by far the most interesting character in the movie but he truly didn't have real moments to demonstrate why he was the main and most brutal villain in the movie.

I dug it. The Direction is really classy and the atmosphere is always pale, sad, and unsettling. The lake and forest settings add mystery to the plot.

Also, the camera angles are very good and creative for a movie like this; I liked the direct-to-video feeling which increases the disturbing factor.

The acting is great. Everyone is perfect on their role. Special mention for Ben Goodwin who delivers a brave, dramatic, and raging performance.

Great actor! Sarah Paxton delivers also a brave performance, way to go girl! With your looks and moods, I couldn't believe you starred in such a brutal film.

Monica Potter looks really pretty but acts brave and smart when she had to do it. I really expected her character to use her sexuality as a weapon against her daughter's aggressors.

But that's just me. I expected more violence on a revenge flick, I mean, the villains did something horrible and they deserved fatal and horrific demises as consequence.

Maybe society is changing for good I did not watch the entire movie because I turned it off during the extremely graphic rape scene. This level of detail is disgusting and I am a big fan of horror flicks.

This is the worst I have seen. It is not necessary to be this graphic to create fear and anger. Shame on the writers, directors, and the entire cast and production company for producing this level of filth.

Shame on our ratings system for giving it an R rating. This is clearly an X or at least an NC Pathetic waste of my time and money.

I had watched the original with friends before. What attracted it to us was the way the movie was being put across "to avoid fainting keep repeating it's just a movie" etc.

We loved horror and anything just generally shocking it was the most fun along with comedy's you could have with friends!.

Well it certainly did not let anyone one of us down it was pretty insane?! Either way a truly great piece of horror beyond what any of us had seen at the time.

When i heard about This Re-make i was not so much excited but anxious to see how they would handle the story and the scenes that would be necessary to tell it to the best of it's ability.

I was impressed. I knew straight away it would be reasonably mild compared to the first one it had to be , to be watchable in cinemas in order to make money.

And for the most part it was. Well with a horror film that's half the battle straight away. Obviously you probably know this film is centred around a group of convicts who are a perfect example of a human being with no soul or heart.

And this even better than the first one in my opinion is displayed amazingly. In this film you really get the feeling that these guys would do anything to any human being in the world and would not feel one bit of remorse for there actions.

I would even go as far as to say out of every film i've ever watched these have to be some of the scariest people i've seen on the silver screen.

It all adds to the great experience. I thought it was handled pretty well. What this film hits straight on the head is the atmosphere the music and every aspect of the film combined just build up to exploding point then it happens.

It was like nothing i'd experienced in a cinema before the place was packed out with what was to be honest a perfect testing range for the film there were people of my age 18 all the way to what i would have said was about ish.

As the scenes built up and up the piercing sounds of the girls screams , the actions taking place on screen and everything accumulated into one terrifying experience.

I looked round the once rowdy room to find everyone silent and i could just feel it someone had to walk out. And they did. For the first time in my life a film was that shocking that as many as 10 people walked out and couldn't come back.

That is what horror is meant to do!. So at this point Last House had already scored high marks with me it had stayed as true to the original as it could have.

There was also someone crying behind us! The first half is horrible it is meant to shock and appaul the audience so that when the second kicks in it satisfies all!.

And god does it never before has revenge felt so right. People again were re-acting to the film again in a way i'd never seen people were clapping chants "get in" , "have it" "go on" and cheering.

Admitadley by the younger members of the audience but non the less a great re-action. In my eyes this film was just as perfect as this re-make could have been it had it all.

And it was one of the first films i'd seen in along time that was almost more than a film it was a genuine experience.

Oh and you'd be surprised to know the acting was actually very well done i wouldn't have changed it at all t be honest again pleasantly surprised.

Only things that this film down was the fact that it's still a pointless story and if not for the shock factor couldn't possibly be even an average film!.

It's definitely one of the better horror re-makes and one everyone will have a load of fun watching what more can you ask for in this day and age!.

I saw this, when it came out in the theaters. When the rape scene came about, i was said to myself, really? I am a 39 year old man, 36 at the time this movie came out and i was disgusted by that scene.

I was so angry at the director for putting so much,emphasis on having me,watch and listen to a young woman's pain,agony and terror for that long.

I will never go see a wes craven movie again, since that movie. I will not support a director, that would put such trash, in a movie. I would think,that we could get a sense of a rape scene,without it lasting forever.

Last House On The Left Rape Scene 2009 Video

Last House On The Left // Justin vs. Krug